Power to the Forwards

This feature was first published in the 2013 - No.1 edition of SLAM China Magazine. Here is my original English version of the story.

It all began in London.

As Team USA – America’s Men’s Basketball team – swept their way through to their second consecutive Gold Medal at the Olympics, fans in London, England, got to see a fine collections of superstars fitting in together to make an indestructible squad. There was Kobe Bryant, one of the living legends of basketball and, as an elder statesman, the leader of the collective. There was Chris Paul, the finest point guard in the NBA, and a superstar talent who left a mark at the Olympics. There were more talented guards like Russell Westbrook and Deron Williams, and there were big men like Tyson Chandler and Kevin Love who made sure that USA dominated the inside, too.

But three individuals separated themselves from the rest. Three of them who played at such a high level that, at various points in the competitions, all three could compete for the nomination of the tournament’s most valuable player. In a team spoilt with talent, these three stood head and shoulders above the rest.

And all three, technically, played the same position.

Between LeBron James, Kevin Durant, and Carmelo Anthony, Team USA was loaded at the Small Forward position. They decided to include all three, and all three made sure that their inclusion was more than justified. Anthony made history against Nigeria by scoring the highest point total by an American at the Olympics – 37 – in just 14 minutes! James was the team’s motor, leading the squad from start to finish and taking over in the clutch moments of the gold medal game against Spain for the win. Durant was the tournament’s leading scorer and consistently put up big numbers in each game.

In the fluidly changing definitions of basketball positions, all three players found themselves in new roles from time to time in London. Gone are the days when the biggest players in a basketball team were the most dominant. The best players for the American side were their forwards, and, facing a shortage of big men in the middle, Anthony, James, and Durant all took turns playing at the power forward or even Center position in the ‘small-ball’ lineup for USA.

The momentum of London has carried on back home in the NBA. James, Durant, and Anthony all find themselves playing high-level basketball two months into the new season, and have been the three best individual players in the NBA so far. And curiously, all three are following a similar blueprint to their success.

With the start of the 2012 NBA season, the ‘small-ball’ effect spread like wildfire ravaging throughout the league. Following the triumph of the Miami Heat playing 6-foot-8 LeBron James at the power forward position at crucial moments in their championship run back in June, other teams began to field smaller lineups as well. This was partly to keep up with the quickening pace of the game and partly to make up for the scarcity of high-scoring back to the basket players around the league.

In the Finals, LeBron matched up on most occasions against Durant, who also played bigger than his position to keep up with the Finals MVP. By the time the new season began, the Thunder too began to play Durant as a power forward on numerous occasions with Serge Ibaka as their centerpiece instead of Kendrick Perkins to force a smaller, quicker game.

In New York, with Amar’e Stoudemire ailing, Coach Mike Woodson began to follow the same pattern with the Knicks. A natural small forward, Carmelo Anthony was shifted to the power forward position and the Knicks began to start with Raymond Felton, Jason Kidd, and Ronnie Brewer – three guards – in their backcourt.

The experiments so far have paid huge dividends for all three players and their teams. James has been able to demonstrate his versatility by shifting positions on both ends of the floor to defend both perimeter and post players and attack from the outside or the inside. After having a magical 2012, LeBron and the Heat are continuing their run as one of the NBA’s most feared teams and leading contenders to defend their crown. Teammates Dwyane Wade and Chris Bosh may have been a step slower so far, but LeBron has been able to diversify his skill-set to get the most out of the Heat roster.

Over in Oklahoma City, Durant and the Thunder have come out the gates on fire this season. Perhaps hungry for success after coming so close to a championship last season, Durant seems to be on a mission this year to get back on top. Despite losing teammate James Harden, the Thunder seem to have become even better with the inclusion of Kevin Martin and improved play by both Durant and Westbrook. Durant in particular has evolved as a better well-rounded player, rebounding, creating, defending at the elite level, and still remaining one of the best scorers that the NBA has ever seen. Durant has the size of most NBA power forwards but the ability to stretch the floor and shoot the ball like a perimeter player. The Thunder have been able to plug him in as a big player when needed this year to beat slower teams on their speed and athleticism.

Even until earlier this year, Carmelo Anthony and the New York Knicks mirrored each other in a non-flattering way. Both the player and the team carried high expectations but were never able to quite carry them off in past years. Anthony had undisputable talent – especially on the offensive end – as a deadly scorer who can find a way to put the ball in the basket in a multitude of ways. But his shortcomings as a leader, a passer, and a defender left him in the shadows of other stars like LeBron or Durant. But this season, playing most of his time as a power forward, everything has changed. Anthony has become more comfortable with having other guards in the lineup to spread the floor and hit the open jump-shot or to help create high-scoring situations for him. In return, he has answered with his most efficient season yet, scoring at a high level but also defending and leading his team better. As the calendar year ends, the surprising Knicks find themselves near the top of the Eastern Conference while Anthony blooms as a fresh new contender for the early MVP award.

Meanwhile, other teams have tried out their versions of ‘Small Power Forwards’ as well. The Nets moved Kris Humphries to the bench and moved 6-foot-7 Gerald Wallace to play power forward to improve their team’s offensive moment. Atlanta has been playing their two best players – Josh Smith and Al Horford – out of position for years to moderate success. A natural PF, Horford starts games as a Center with Smith, who may not have the back to the basket game of an average post player, to play at the power forward position. In the absence of Kevin Love, the Timberwolves played major chunks of their early season with Andrei Kirilenko as a power forward. Shaun Marion regularly dons the ‘dual forward’ role for the Mavericks, too.

All in all, it seems like a good year to be for the natural small forward. The position is top heavy with the talents of Durant, LeBron, and Anthony, but strong showings by the likes of Rudy Gay, Luol Deng, Paul Pierce, Andrei Kirilenko, and Josh Smith make this position as loaded as it has ever been. They are all multi-talented players now who in many teams have become the center of the system, the players around whom the offense and defense revolves, and the players who are counted on to help make the big plays at the game’s biggest moments.

Of course, not everyone is buying into the trend. When the Lakers teamed up Dwight Howard and Pau Gasol, they made it clear that they still believe that bigger is better. With point guard Steve Nash out in the early half of the season, LA struggled. But they seemed to have put together a decent run of late and make a dash up the Western Conference standings. Teams like the Clippers, Spurs, Grizzlies, Pacers, Jazz, and the surprising Golden State Warriors continue to field a more traditional ‘one-to-five’ lineup with good players in the middle as well as sharp-shooters on the perimeter.

But the standout individual talents in the season have been the three superstars who are also early top candidates for the MVP trophy: James, Durant, and Anthony. All three are guaranteed to be starters in the mid-season All Star Game – both for their immense popularity and for their actual production this season – but their work will truly count when the playoffs begin.

James and Durant, as well as their teams, have proven themselves with deep playoff runs and an epic matchup in last season’s Final. Anthony and the Knicks have had a fantastic start to the season, but their playoff credentials will be in doubt until they can prove themselves in the post-season. All three are now backed up with decent teams and systems to back them up, but ultimately, it will be the brilliance of the superstars in the middle that will be the difference between a good team and a great one.

And just like the previous summer in London, the next summer in the NBA postseason could also come down to the performances of these three forwards. The USA Olympics teammates played together and earned each other’s respect in London, but now, they will stand in each other’s way en route to the 2013 NBA Championship.

FIBA 33: A boon or a curse for hoops?

When the first ever Youth Olympic Games (YOG) took place in Singapore earlier this year, there was no sign of a proper basketball tournament. I use "proper basketball" deliberately, because the tournament showcased the large scale debut of FIBA's latest brainchild, the FIBA 33.

Maybe I used correct the "latest brainchild" statement - after all, every ball player alive (no really, EVERY ball player alive) has played a less formalised version of FIBA 33. If you don't know, FIBA 33 is half-court basketball, played 3-on-3, first one to 33 in regulation time wins. Regulation time is just 10 minutes (with five minute halves), and if no team reaches 33, the one leading when time expires wins. Each team has three players plus one substitute. There is just a 10 second shot-clock, and like the international unspoken rules of basketball half-court play, if the defensive team gains possession of the ball, they have to first pass it outside the three-point arc before starting their offense.

It sounds suspiciously like every pick-up game ever played, except with referees and timers - plus I'm not sure if FIBA would be too hot on the Shirts vs. Skins idea.

Anyways, due to the fast-paced and exciting nature of the game, it was a roaring success at the YOG, capturing the largest (and loudest) crowds. Even India had a four-member squad present at the games - they failed to win any of their group games, but beat a couple of teams in the 17-20 classification to end at 18th spot.

The success prompted FIBA to discuss the format at the FIBA World Conference in Istanbul during the World Championships. Now, FIBA are hoping to take the 3-on-3 format to a bigger stage.

“We are all very excited about FIBA33, and in view of its popularity after just one day, it isn’t too far fetched to imagine it one day making it into the Olympics in its own right,” said FIBA Secretary-General Patrick Baumann.

Baumann has even said: "The US will always be able to have 12 players of the same quality which India would not be able to have. But India can have three, four or five players who can play three-on-three and they will be at the same level as the US"

FIBA president Bob Elphinston has added: "We want to use FIBA 33 to encourage more young girls and boys to play the game, to get started in basketball. We also want to create FIBA 33 as a separate discipline, not dissimilar to what we see at the Olympic Games with volleyball, in that we have beach volleyball and we have volleyball."

Is there anyone else here who thinks this new concept sounds a bit too familiar? Let's see, what is that one sport in India that involves a lot of players and goes on for five days? There is a one-day version of that sport, too, but it goes on for hours and hours. People love this sport in our country but the organisers and some fans (but mainly, the advertisers) felt the show was too long and too slow to be enjoy / capitalised on fully. So they introduced a much shorter version of the game, inspired by the version played on the grass-root level, and gave it a nifty name with a two-digit number and soon, this version became so big and popular that those who fell in love with the original version of the sport said that the new version was killing it.

I'm talking of course of cricket - After the Test format and ODI format was deemed 'too slow' for some fans, in came Twenty-20 cricket, with just 20 over games to satisfy all our cricketing needs in under three hours. T-20 has become a phenomenon since, and its league in India, the IPL, has become almost as lucrative as football's EPL and basketball's NBA.

But T-20 critics are aplenty - many have complained that it has killed the soul of the game, or that it encourages pinch-hitting cricket without the classic technical skills, that it has become more of a spectacle than a sport.

Whatever side you take on this argument, it is clear that T-20 is here to stay. Now, FIBA 33 is a similar story in many ways. Of course, basketball's long format is about the same length as cricket's short one, but the intention in both cases is to serve the needs of the our collectively shortening attention spans (I'd be surprised if many readers have actually attentively made it this far down in this article!). Just like T-20, FIBA goes back to the grass-roots of the game, thus perhaps encouraging more participation.

But this is where we feel that FIBA needs to be careful. The 3-on-3 format encourages the one thing that many basketball purists detest - the 'I' not in 'Team'. Shanmugam Sridhar, the coach of India's 3-on-3 team that played in Singapore, said: "The 3-on-3 format made for very quick games. It especially helped in showcasing the talents of individual players."

Just like cricket purists have complained that T-20 has "dumbed-down" the game, FIBA 33 critics too may claim that the new format might be a too simplistic version to feature on the big stage.

On the positive note though, T-20 has been good for other formats of cricket in one way - by changing the player's attitude towards greater aggression, and of course, serving as a good platform for youngsters to prove their mettle for the "more respected" versions of the games.

FIBA 33 scores big in the fact that it will be able to involve more countries, since they will be required to field lesser players. India's involvement in the tournament in Singapore proved just that. Also, quicker games would mean greater participation. And both T-20 and FIBA 33 have been great crowd-pullers, so why not just give the people what they want?

Which side of the fence do you sit on with this issue? And while you mull over it, here is a video of the Indian three-on-three team at the Youth Olympics in their 27-11 win over South Africa.